Uncategorized

Hello all, Sorry it took a while to get back to the list.There were several replies regarding this case. The consensus was delaminating injury of the medial prepatellar quadriceps continuation. There is a very nice discussion here: Prepatellar Quadriceps Continuation: MRI of Cadavers with Gross Anatomic and Histologic Correlation (thank you Dr. Resnick for another […]

This is an incidental osteochondral mass posterior to the femoral neck in a 73M imaged by CT to evaluate abdominal pain It seems to arise from the outer cortex, without medullary continuity Is the cortical thinning / interruption posteriorly concerning? The body imager recommended the Hip MRI I’m reporting Harder to appreciate the continuity with

The patient finally came back for followup of her lesion – parent declined contrast. ax T1 axPDFS cor T1 cor STIR Sag PDFS Sag STIR On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 4:40 PM Susie Muir <drsjmuir> wrote: It is hard to show the extent of the lesion on Cor and axial. I have asked for MRI

Just received an interesting observation from Julio Brandao: Seems that is also edema in the bone surrounding the surgical cavity. It’s not uncommon inflammatory reaction after this type of surgery, specially when they use some new type of synthetic cement (usually present with significant inflammatory response). **I didn’t have the exact date of surgery, but

>  > Hello Everyone > > Please find the attached images for this case and reply me with your opinion please. > > Is this usual to see or is something rare to happen? I am considering reporting this case. I had done a lot of research but did not find a similar case

Hi ocarder´s. Thanks for the comments. There seems to be no other idea than bilateral huge accessory navicular bone. Thank you to everyone who commented. André Is this could be a huge bilateral accessory naviculars ? Have you seen it like this ? Something else ? Tks. André

Hello all, I appreciate all the responses we got! The majority of respondents favored an intramuscular cyst, complex cyst, or hematoma rather than a neoplasm. We’ll keep you updated if we see follow up with a contrast study or pathology results. Thanks again, Elyor On Feb 7, 2024, at 1:49 PM wrote: Hello, I’m an

I first posted this on Dec 20, 2023….in consult for my colleague Jonathan Sterman.Follow up MRI with and without contrast was recommended, but it was ordered non-contrast, I don’t think that matters. I think there is definitely diminished marrow edema, but there is still this cortically based bright PDFS lesion….do you think it’s an incidental