5 thoughts on “Calf MRI Please Help”

  1. hilary.umans
    Hi Hilary,

    That’s the appearance of free silicon with some smaller nodules in the calf muscles. Here’s a couple from a butt augmentation with free silicon. PD fatsat on the left, STIR on the right.

    Mark Awh

    Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 1:49 PM

    40 yr old male “injected his calved with liquid to make them bigger” 10 years ago. Now complains of bilateral calf pain.
    These are images from an Open 1.2T MRI
    I don’t understand the signal characteristics of the rounted foci …the largest in the subcutaneous soft tissues of the posteromedial calf.
    Intermediate T1, Dark T1 and T2 fat sat, but Bright STIR.
    There is no enhancement.
    How can it be dark on T2FS and Bright on STIR?


  2. I didn’t make myself clear. I understand these are Free Silicone
    injections.
    I don’t understand the Signal…although it is typical.
    Why would it be uniformly dark on T2FS and Bright on STIR?

    Thanks.

    Hilary

    [gallery]

  3. Joseph Zerr answered my question, thank you!

    The TI peaks for fat and silicone are close, but not identical. Water based
    STIR will still have signal in silicone. A separate silicone based STIR is
    used in breast imaging to help find free silicone. That sequence completely
    nulls the signal from silicone.

    Hope that helps,
    Joe

    [gallery]

  4. David Wayne Robinson elaborated on the answer to my question:

    To expound a little on that answer, it is necessary to remember how
    spectral fat saturation differs from inversion recovery.

    Specifically, spectral fat saturation takes advantage of the different
    proton resonant frequencies of materials (namely water and fat), which are
    measured in chemical shift parts per million (water = 4.7 ppm and fat = 1.3
    ppm). The resonant frequency of injected silicon depends on the actual
    compound, but as an example, the silicon compound used in ophthalmic
    injections is PDMS and has a resonant frequency of 0.33 ppm. A spectral sat
    band that includes fat will typically overlap with silicon.

    In contrast, inversion recovery takes advantage of the different TI of
    materials. And while fat and silicon-compounds have similar proton resonant
    frequencies, their T1 relaxation times differ substantially. Fat is about
    260 ms at 1.5T, whereas PDMS is 716 ms at 1.5T. So an IR timed for fat will
    nullify fat and materials with similar and shorter T1 times. Materials
    with a longer T1 times (such as silicon) will have measurable signal.

    I know this is a very “physic-y” answer, but you asked a physics questions.
    I hope this helps.

    -David

    [gallery]

  5. avneesh.chhabra
    Great explanation!

    Enjoy silicon in left eye- behaves differently – see attached

    btw- there are silicon maps available in spectral ct as well

    Best!
    AC

    Avneesh Chhabra, M.D. M.B.A.
    Professor, Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery
    Chief, Musculoskeletal Radiology
    Department of Radiology
    5323 Harry Hines, Blvd. Dallas, Tx-75390-9316
    Office: 214-648-2122
    http://www.utsouthwestern.edu/radiology<http://www.utsouthwestern.edu/education/medical-school/departments/radiology/>

    
    EXTERNAL MAIL

    David Wayne Robinson elaborated on the answer to my question:

    To expound a little on that answer, it is necessary to remember how spectral fat saturation differs from inversion recovery.

    Specifically, spectral fat saturation takes advantage of the different proton resonant frequencies of materials (namely water and fat), which are measured in chemical shift parts per million (water = 4.7 ppm and fat = 1.3 ppm). The resonant frequency of injected silicon depends on the actual compound, but as an example, the silicon compound used in ophthalmic injections is PDMS and has a resonant frequency of 0.33 ppm. A spectral sat band that includes fat will typically overlap with silicon.

    In contrast, inversion recovery takes advantage of the different TI of materials. And while fat and silicon-compounds have similar proton resonant frequencies, their T1 relaxation times differ substantially. Fat is about 260 ms at 1.5T, whereas PDMS is 716 ms at 1.5T. So an IR timed for fat will nullify fat and materials with similar and shorter T1 times. Materials with a longer T1 times (such as silicon) will have measurable signal.

    I know this is a very “physic-y” answer, but you asked a physics questions.
    I hope this helps.

    -David

    40 yr old male “injected his calved with liquid to make them bigger” 10 years ago. Now complains of bilateral calf pain.
    These are images from an Open 1.2T MRI
    I don’t understand the signal characteristics of the rounted foci …the largest in the subcutaneous soft tissues of the posteromedial calf.
    Intermediate T1, Dark T1 and T2 fat sat, but Bright STIR.
    There is no enhancement.
    How can it be dark on T2FS and Bright on STIR?
    [40M 10yrs post calf injections.jpg]
    [40M 10yrs post calf injections (1).jpg]
    [40M 10yrs post calf injections (2).jpg]

    [gallery]

Leave a Comment